as it is written on the page: https://www.illustris-project.org/data/downloads/Illustris-3/
Illustris-3 is based on the cosmology as inferred from WMAP-9. Yet, looking into their corresponding paper: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19/pdf
Table 4, the Hubble constant does not match the one on the Illustris-3 page above. Looking into Table 3, it seems that the values are rather WMAP-7. So which WMAP DR was used or did you choose the cosmological parameters just similarly but not exactly the same?
Best wishes,
Jenny
Dylan Nelson
29 Mar
I see a note that original Illustris used values taken from Komatsu et al. 2011 (Table 1, v2), specifically "TT+BAO+H0". Note that "v2" refers to the arxiv version of this paper.
Although, I don't see exactly these values.
I think you are right and the best would be to interpret the statement "... parameters are consistent with the latest Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP)-9 measurements (Hinshaw et al. 2013)." in that sense, i.e. consistent with. Figuring out exactly where they came from is probably difficult at this point.
Hi!
as it is written on the page:
https://www.illustris-project.org/data/downloads/Illustris-3/
Illustris-3 is based on the cosmology as inferred from WMAP-9. Yet, looking into their corresponding paper:
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0067-0049/208/2/19/pdf
Table 4, the Hubble constant does not match the one on the Illustris-3 page above. Looking into Table 3, it seems that the values are rather WMAP-7. So which WMAP DR was used or did you choose the cosmological parameters just similarly but not exactly the same?
Best wishes,
Jenny
I see a note that original Illustris used values taken from Komatsu et al. 2011 (Table 1, v2), specifically "TT+BAO+H0". Note that "v2" refers to the arxiv version of this paper.
Although, I don't see exactly these values.
I think you are right and the best would be to interpret the statement "... parameters are consistent with the latest Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP)-9 measurements (Hinshaw et al. 2013)." in that sense, i.e. consistent with. Figuring out exactly where they came from is probably difficult at this point.
Okay, I see...thanks a lot for the details!